17th century Particular Baptist divines addressing modern souls…
Wolfe's post highlights a key distinction between church establishment and civil duty. By focusing on honoring God, he challenges common misconceptions about Christian nationalism and its implications for civil governance.
The resurgence of interest in political theology among Christians prompts a crucial examination of the historical roots of liberty and conscience. As The Particular Baptist Podcast and Blog challenge the notion that early Baptists supported secular liberty, it's vital to understand the distinct theological foundations shaping their views. This exploration promises deeper insights into the intersection of faith and governance.
Romans 13 does not describe the pathway to a Christian empire. It describes the posture of a pilgrim people—those whose citizenship is in heaven, who live peaceably on earth, and who trust God’s providence even when Caesar is no friend to Christ. And that reality does not merely challenge Christian Nationalism. It exposes it as a theology built on anachronism, impatience, and a refusal to live as exiles.
At first glance, such proposals sound pious, serious, bold, and even practical when not examined for their implications. In reality, they are deeply problematic—biblically, theologically, historically, and pastorally. They rest on a confusion of law and gospel, a flattening of redemptive history, and a romanticized mythology of American greatness that mistakes cultural dominance for Christian faithfulness.
Particularly Modern 